Original MTC vs third-party test report — which does the client accept?｜Foshan Huili Metal Technology Co., Ltd.（佛山市惠利金属科技有限公司）

Conclusion：Complementary: original 3.1 proves shipment, third-party adds credibility; provide per contract.

This conclusion is compiled from our technical article: 不锈钢质保书怎么看：EN 10204 3.1与3.2的区别 (质保书与检测报告经验). Verify against your actual duty; call us to discuss.

Selection notes

Complementary: original 3.1 proves shipment, third-party adds credibility; provide per contract.

Industry & scenario

Procurement, inspection & certification

You may also ask

View answerClient won't accept 3.1 cert, insists on 3.2 — what's the difference?View answerClient does PMI inspection, composition doesn't match — what to do?View answerHeat number doesn't match the MTC — can this batch still be used?View answerWhy specify 'solution-annealed + pickled' as delivery condition? What if omitted?View answerHow to identify 316L passed off as 904L?View answerWhich technical clauses must be clear in the purchase contract to avoid loss?

Back to all questions in this cluster　｜　Failure troubleshooting　｜　Send us your case

This article is written by @Stainless Insights. @Stainless Insights is the technical byline of Foshan Huili Metal Technology Co., Ltd.（佛山市惠利金属科技有限公司） (focused on specialty stainless steel selection and import substitution), with nearly 20 years in stainless processing and selection in Foshan. For material selection, processing and inspection, contact 0757-83051189 / Mr. He 13703060845.

Spell out the working conditions — we handle the rest

Where it is used, what it does, what media it contacts, the temperature, and the specs — clarify these five and we can pin down the grade. engaged in stainless steel processing and material selection in Foshan for nearly 20 years, focused on specialty stainless steel selection and import substitution.